Annual Report 2013-14 were called for interrogation and they were neither detained nor tortured. The victims were taken to hospital for treatment on 23 June 2012 by their parents. The injuries were found on the people which were caused by blunt hard weapon like baton, hunter. It was informed that an NCR No.3/12 u/s 323/114 IPC was registered against four police personal at Dasada Police Station on 29 June 2012 and the police officials were transferred. 4.141 Upon consideration of the report, the Commission held that it was established that the human rights of the victims were violated as the MLC revealed that the minor children were tortured and beaten, action was taken against police personnel by Superintendent of Police and NCR also registered against the erring police officials. Hence, the Commission issued a notice u/s 18 of the Protection of Human Rights Act to the Government of Gujarat through its Chief Secretary calling upon him to show cause as to why interim relief should not be recommended to be paid to the victims. He was also directed to inform the Commission regarding the status of NCR No.3/12. 4.142 Despite a reminder, the State government did not respond to the notice. 4.143 Since the State government failed to respond, the Commission in its proceedings dated 21 May 2013 presumed that the State Government had nothing to say in defense and therefore recommended to the Government of Gujarat to pay a sum of `10,000 each to Nareshbhai Nanjibhai Chauhan, Nizamudin Yusufbhai Laheriya, Ishamudin Yusufbhai Laheria and Aslambhai Hajibhai Divan. 4.144 On receipt of proof of payment of compensation of ` 10,000/- each to the four victims as per recommendation of the Commission, the case was closed on 27 August 2013. 17. Harassment and Torture of the Complainant and Implication in a False Case by Police in District Sirsa, Haryana (Case No.1516/7/18/2013) 4.145 The Commission received a complaint from Shri Arihant Jain, resident of District Sirsa, Haryana, alleging that he was physically assaulted on 15 September 2011 and though the matter was reported to the police of Police Station Elnabad but instead of taking action against the offender, he was subjected to custodial violence for compromising the matter and was rather falsely implicated in a case. He prayed for intervention by the Commission in the matter. 4.146 The Commission took cognizance of the complaint and vide its proceedings dated 6 March 2013 called for an action taken report from the Inspector General of Police, Hissar Range who informed the Commission that both the parties had compromised the matter and that the allegations of the petitioner could not be substantiated. 4.147 A copy of the aforesaid report was sent to the complainant seeking his comments. In response, the complainant contradicted the police version and reiterated his allegations. NHRC | 53