5. CONCLUSION While there are still many issues concerning the rights of IP in Malaysia that need to be looked into and addressed, efforts have been made by various stakeholders to find measures that may mitigate if not resolve these issues. Some of these measures have proven to be effective and some can even be considered as good practices. It is important that these good practices be shared with other stakeholders inside or outside of Malaysia so that the good practices can be emulated and implemented to address similar issues from other countries. These good practices may be able to boost the level of fulfilment and respect towards the human rights and fundamental freedoms of IP. In addressing the rights on IP, it is crucial to take cognizance of some of the main concerns, which are as follows: i. It is important to focus on the restitution of non-recognition of customary lands, redress mechanisms for the loss of the land, review compensation payment made on land taken for development and enhancement of the capacity of land departments; ii. Government bodies are called upon to adopt a human rights based approach to development with the application of the Free, Prior and Informed Consent principle; iii. To promote sustainable development models with active involvement and participation of indigenous people in Forest Management and other areas, that do not have an adverse effect on the indigenous communities; iv. Immediate implementation of corrective measures on indigenous issues especially in relation to health, education, economic development, civil and political reformation, laws and policies as well as social and cultural heritage. SUHAKAM urges stakeholders including Government agencies and CSOs to step up their efforts in uplifting the status of indigenous status particularly in terms of economic, social and cultural aspects. Finally, SUHAKAM urges all stakeholders to uphold principles of the UNDRIP so as to promote greater acknowledgement and respect for the rights of IP. 53