104. In case of public officials in the Prosecutors’ Offices (prosecutors and judicial police officers), the use of the equipment is not stipulated in the “Prosecutors’ Office Act” but only in established rule of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office (Guideline for Use of Equipment during Arrest and Escort), which brings up a problem that fundamental rights are not restricted by laws but by an administrative rule. In this regard, the NHRCK recommended in 20018 and 2016 that the legal grounds for the use of the equipment for prosecution shall be provided by laws, not by administrative rules. Questions 105. Please state your position and reasons in detail on the comments that law enforcement officers’ guideline for using the equipment under the current stipulations still excessively violated the freedom of body. 106. Please explain improvement measures of the criticism that the legal grounds for the use of equipment should be provided by laws for public officials in the prosecutors’ offices. C. New Major Issues Issue 1: Remedies for Victims of Torture or Ill-treatment by the State Status 37