The MOAs with government agencies should provide for suspension of the project/program while mediation and/or arbitration settles the dispute. MoAs involving royalties for exploitation of natural resources may contain similar provisions as a pre-condition for consent of the IPs. d) Training and Capacity Building of IP Stakeholders through the IP Human Rights Observatory Strengthen Capacity of IP leaders including IPOs, IPS and IPMRs. Detailed training needs were identified by IP representatives during the national inquiry. This will also include engaging and supporting the Mindanao IPMR leagues, and the formalization IPMR league all throughout the country in linkage with IPHRO. e) Financial Support by the State to the IP Human Rights Observatory and Fiscal Monitoring of other IP-related Budget Allocations Full operationalization of IPHRO should be properly and sufficiently finance through GAA allocation within CHR and other relevant government agencies as well as funded from external sources. Furthermore, Fiscal Monitoring of IP-related public expenditures to track budget, net worth and resources of IPs, including a government-wide tagging of IP-related budget allocation & utilization for the supply side as well as the full accounting of the financial requirements of all ADSDPP for the demand side of fiscal monitoring ought to be done. f) Establishment of a PARTNERSHIP for a core group of government agencies in the management of the IP Human Rights Observatory. These agencies are NCIP, DENR, DAR, DSWD, NEDA, NHA, DOH, DepEd, NCCA, PSA and this partnership will be convened before the end of 2018 Page | 29