Part 1A complaints by entity, ground and decision The table below shows the public-sector entities or type of public-sector entities that had complaints laid against them, the prohibited grounds of discrimination alleged, and the Director’s decisions. Public Sector Entity Ground5 Decision Ministry of Health Family status (9) Disability (2) Yes (3), NFA6 (2), No (4) No (2) District Health Board Disability (2) Yes (1), No (1) University/educational Institute Disability (3) Ethnic/national origins (1) Family status (1) Yes (S)7(1), No (2) No (1) No (1) New Zealand Police Disability (1) Sex (1) Family status (1) Yes (S)(1) NFA (1) No (1) Accident Compensation Corporation Family status (1) Disability (1) Yes (1) No (1) Housing New Zealand Disability (1) NFA (1) City/Regional council Disability (2) No (2) Department of Corrections Religious belief (1) Disability (1) No (1) No (1) Ministry of Social Development Family status (1) No (1) Office of the Ombudsman Disability (1) No (1) Work & Income New Zealand Disability (1) No (1) Department of Internal Affairs Ethnic/national origins (1) Victimisation (1) No (1) No (1) Ministry of Education Family status (1) No (1) 5 Where an applicant has relied on several grounds, a single primary ground has been isolated. 6 ‘NFA’ denotes that the Director decided to take no further action on the application. 7 ‘(S)’ denotes that representation was provided for settlement purposes only. 44 Human Rights Commission