12 Ombudsman (Komesina o Sulufaiga) Act 2013 (4) On the request of the Minister responsible for the matter being investigated or if an investigation relates to any recommendation made to a Minister, the Ombudsman must, after making the investigation, consult the Minister before forming a final opinion on a matter referred to in section 28(1) or (2). 26. Referral of matters to appropriate authority – If, during or after an investigation, the Ombudsman is of the opinion that there is evidence of a breach of duty or misconduct on the part of an officer of a Ministry or organisation, the Ombudsman must refer the matter to the appropriate authority. 27. Other procedures – Subject to this Act, the Ombudsman may regulate other procedures under this Part. Division 2 – Results of investigations and immunities 28. Procedures after investigation – (1) This section applies to the following cases: (a) a case where, after an investigation, the Ombudsman is of the opinion that the administrative decision which was the subjectmatter of the investigation— (i) appears to have been contrary to law; or (ii) was unreasonable, unjust, oppressive, or discriminatory, or was in accordance with a rule of law or a provision of any enactment or a practice that is or may be unreasonable, unjust, oppressive, or discriminatory; or (iii) was based wholly or partly on a mistake of law or fact; or (iv) was wrong; (b) a case where the Ombudsman is of the opinion that— (i) in the making of the administrative decision under an enactment, a discretionary power has been exercised for an improper purpose or on irrelevant grounds or on the taking into account of irrelevant considerations; or