the case of the dissolution of the Islamic Defenders Front and HTI. This case ignites discussions between the pros and the cons. The government must further protect freedom of assembly and association because the Mass Organizations Law allows restrictions on the rights to freedom of association and assembly, which are guaranteed by the 1945 State Constitution and the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 81. Regarding the issue of disbanding or banning mass organizations, the government must not dissolve organizations solely based on the principle of contrarius actus and act without a judicial process mechanism (due process of law). "From a human rights perspective, the sanction of revoking the legal entity status of an organization based on the principle of contrarius actus is unjustified because it provides freedom and arbitrariness in shutting down an organization. This is related to the right to freedom of association as a negative right, which means that the state is prohibited from doing so. Interventions that reduce the enjoyment of these rights are referred to as positive obligations where the state is obliged to ensure that all citizens enjoy these rights. "Guaranteeing the right to freedom of association and assembly is an important characteristic for a rule of law and a democratic state, if it does not provide certainty regarding the right to freedom of association and assembly then it can be said that the country is not fully democratic. 82. The rights of association and assembly are individual and collective rights that intersect with civil rights and political rights. This right is also closely related to the right to freedom of expression and opinion which is actualized by the freedom of people to convey thoughts, ideas, aspirations, and beliefs collectively. 83. Restrictions must not be intended to reduce the right to freedom of association and assembly. These restrictions must first be regulated by law. The government's decision to cancel the legal entity status of an organization, meaning to revoke the rights and obligations attached to the legal subject, is a form of punishment (constitutive) that must be based on a court decision. 84. Based on the principle of due process of law, an organization that violates criminal law, disturbs public order, threatens public safety, or endangers state security can be dissolved through criminal proceedings simultaneously against the people representing the organization. Rights of the Child 85. The abolition of corporal punishment is regulated in Law No. 35/2014 on Child Protection. Meanwhile, Law No. 11/2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System regulates diversion and restorative justice mechanisms for children. In the implementation, diversion as an effort to prevent corporal